3

politics is poetry
gone horribly awry
like poetry and consciousness
and everything else that is
meaningful in the real
politics is constituted
entirely of language


1

therefore we are in need of
a politics of consciousness
that will teach us to deconstruct
the messages of manipulation

this new politics will require
a turn to french theory but
we will choose to call it
freedom theory instead in order
to avoid the obvious objections


1

this politics of consciousness will
deconstruct the false binaries
and unexamined assumptions
that have crafted and controlled
our collective cultural conscience
and will enable the public to break down
campaign ads and media sound bites
and unmask hegemonic machinations

this new consciousness will also
finally explode the binary of
the political spectrum
the left on one end and
the right on the other
with one polarizing point
defining the difference

absolute truth
the right believes they have it
and the left believes they don't

it is this point that makes
freedom nee french theory
inherently political and
inescapably necessary to
the politics of consciousness


2

one simple difference dependent
on a metaphysics of presence
a single arbitrary and seemingly
meaningless matter of signification

Posted by Rob on May 5, 2008
Tags: Uncategorized

Total comments on this page: 11

How to read/write comments

Comments on specific paragraphs:

Click the icon to the right of a paragraph

  • If there are no prior comments there, a comment entry form will appear automatically
  • If there are already comments, you will see them and the form will be at the bottom of the thread

Comments on the page as a whole:

Click the icon to the right of the page title (works the same as paragraphs)

Comments

No comments yet.

RG on whole page :

The idea for this poem came to me in the form of the french/freedom dichotomy based on a blog I read on French Theory a few weeks ago by Stanley Fish (http://fish.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/06/french-theory-in-america/).

I really don’t know if this makes sense to anyone but me, and I’ve tried to cut it down as much as I could (which probably makes it even more esoteric, but certainly less pedantic, if you can believe that…).

I’m not sure if I’m going to send it to my normal email list because I don’t know if I have the heart to subject them to such stuff, but I thought I would share it here to get it off my chest.

Let me know what you think…

Rob

May 5, 2008 5:08 pm
SBW on whole page :

Well, I haven’t checked out the Fish blog because it’s the middle of the night at 2:30 a.m. — but I decided to get up instead of tossing and turning — but I love this title.

Are you deliberately not putting a period after Ph.D?

May 6, 2008 2:33 am
SBW on paragraph 1:

Why “politics is” in line one and “politics are” in line 5?

Should discoursetherefore be one word here?
SBW

May 6, 2008 2:44 am
SBW on paragraph 2:

I really like the way the last line of stanza 1 — fast forwards to the similar but different last line of stanza 2 — and how manipulation reels over into machinations.
SBW

May 6, 2008 2:47 am
SBW on paragraph 8:

Love “absolute truth.” Yes, let’s go and get it–at the A&P, at the gas station, in the Holy Church of the Redeemer, at the post office, and flying first class out of here to there.
SBW

May 6, 2008 2:50 am
SBW on paragraph 8:

Love the ending. Such machinations. Love this witting poem.
SBW

May 6, 2008 2:52 am
RG on paragraph 1:

Sloppy editing on the is/are one. I originally had politics and consciousness, and when I took it out, I neglected to correct the verb.

May 6, 2008 6:58 am
Rob on paragraph 1:

I’ve done some serious editing, but I don’t think it messed up any of the comments that are already here.

May 6, 2008 10:55 am
Vivian on whole page :

I just finished reading the Fish NYTimes blog and a few of the appended comments and I am thinking that 2:30 a.m. might be a better time than 3 p.m. I will not pretend that I completely grasp the theory of deconstruction but I think this poem nicely superimposes it on America’s apparently incurable, lamentable, laughable partisanship. Everything’s just words.

May 7, 2008 3:34 pm
Vivian on paragraph 4:

I like “false binaries / and unexamined assumptions” in its buildup to the mathematical
metaphors in these two stanzas.

May 7, 2008 3:38 pm
Rob on whole page :

Well, it took me almost 20 years to understand Derrida, which of course meant, on a very sophisticated level of course, that I can’t truly understand anything…

May 7, 2008 3:47 pm
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI